Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has reignited the debate over the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), stating that the current system of judicial appointments would have been different had the NJAC been implemented. His remarks come amid controversy over a Supreme Court panel meeting at a judge’s residence, raising fresh questions about transparency in judicial appointments.
NJAC Debate Resurfaces
The NJAC, which was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015, aimed to replace the collegium system with a more structured and accountable process for appointing judges. Dhankhar’s latest statement suggests that the commission would have ensured a more transparent and effective mechanism, preventing the kind of controversies currently surrounding the judiciary.
Controversy Over Supreme Court Panel Meeting
The renewed discussion comes in the wake of reports that a Supreme Court panel met at a judge’s residence, leading to concerns over judicial decision-making and procedural propriety. Critics argue that such meetings raise questions about the openness of the system, while supporters of the collegium process maintain that it upholds judicial independence.
Political and Legal Reactions
Dhankhar’s remarks have sparked reactions from legal and political circles. While some believe the NJAC would have brought more accountability, others see it as a potential threat to judicial independence. The judiciary has consistently defended the collegium system, asserting that it ensures autonomy in judicial appointments, free from external influence.
A Debate That Won’t Fade Away
With ongoing concerns over judicial appointments and decision-making processes, the NJAC debate is unlikely to fade anytime soon. Dhankhar’s comments have once again highlighted the longstanding friction between the executive and the judiciary, keeping the discussion over reforms in India’s judicial system alive.